PDA

View Full Version : My Last One


ryr8828
04-10-2009, 08:41 PM
I've found my .308.

FNH-USA continues to introduce interesting and useful fighting weapons. Even while supplying our military with a lot of the arms used to fight terrorism on two different fronts, FNH still has the time and manufacturing capacity to supply the rest of us with new firearm designs. The FNAR shown here has been with me for a couple of weeks now, and has proven to be one hundred percent reliable, and extremely accurate for a fighting rifle. I have long been a fan of the AR-15/AR-10 systems, but there are many who, for whatever reason, do not like the AR gas system, and prefer a piston system for their auto loading rifles. Some manufacturers are building “ARs” with a piston system. If it has a piston, it is not an AR, but something different. Most 7.62x51mm fighting rifles are pretty heavy. My super-accurate DPMS SASS weighs about twelve pounds, but is a fine rifle. Most gas piston rifles of that caliber that are capable of match-grade accuracy weigh as much or more. For those who have been waiting, the new FNAR rifle weighs in at just under eight pounds (7 lbs., 14.8 ounces without magazine to be exact), and uses the short stroke gas piston system. Like its Browning and Winchester auto loading cousins, the FNAR has a very reliable and clean-shooting piston that travels only about ¾ of an inch, sending the action block and twin action rails rearward, unlocking the multiple lug rotating bolt to eject the fired cartridge case, with the under-barrel spring returning the bolt forward to chamber another round. While many find the 5.56mm NATO cartridge to work well for social work, there are times when more power is needed, and in such cases, the 7.62 usually finds favor. The 7.62mm NATO cartridge has a fine reputation for stopping power on the battlefield, and displays excellent accuracy as well in a properly built rifle. In the FNH FNAR, the 7.62 really shines.
The FNAR rifle comes with all that is needed to custom fit the rifle to the shooter. Like many of our modern auto pistols which come with different grip inserts, the FNAR comes with three different cheek pieces and three different butt pads, to allow the shooter to change the comb height and length of pull for a comfortable fit. In addition, there are six different buttstock shims included with the rifle to change the pitch and cast of the buttstock to perfectly fit any shooter. The most important of these, in my experience, is the comb height. Raising the comb as high as possible to allow the shooter’s eye to be directly in line with the scope, while preserving a good cheek weld on the stock, makes for more accurate shot placement. The stock, while very unconventional in shape, is very comfortable to shoot, whether from the bench or in the field. The pistol grip on the FNAR allows good control of the weapon, placing the hand in a very comfortable and natural position for good trigger control. The trigger operates very smoothly. It has a bit of overtravel, but releases well, and is much better than a standard mil-spec AR trigger, but not as light and crisp as an Alexander or Timney (http://www.gunblast.com/Timney.htm) target trigger. Still, it is about ideal for a fighting rifle, with the trigger pull measuring exactly four pounds on the test rifle. The fluted barrel has a matte dark gray finish, and is of a medium profile, measuring .770 diameter at the muzzle. The test rifle came supplied with one twenty-round magazine, and extra magazines of five, ten, and twenty round capacities are offered.
The buttstock and forearm are of a black synthetic material, and there are plenty of Picatinny rails on the forearm for attaching flashlights, laser sights, and accessories. Sling swivel studs are installed for the easy attachment of a sling. Atop the receiver is a Picatinny rail that is plenty long enough to accommodate an ArmaLite mount, or any other Picatinny compatible scope mount.
For accuracy testing, I mounted a Leupold Mark 4 scope of 8.5 to 25 power. This fine scope focuses down closely, and provides a clear sight picture from a few feet out to infinity. The settings are repeatable, and the adjustments precise. As stated earlier, this is an accurate rifle. Getting on paper at twenty five yards, I turned to the fifty yard target, where the first three shots went into one hole. Enough of that, so I sighted on the one hundred yard target, where accuracy was also outstanding. At that range, the FNAR was placing three rounds into less than one-half inch, repeatedly, all day long. I was firing Buffalo Bore Sniper ammo through the FNAR. This ammo uses Sierra 175 grain Match King bullets, and has proven to be the most accurate factory .308 ammo that I have ever fired, in several rifles. When I have a new .308 rifle in here for review, if I have any on the shelf, I always reach for the Buffalo Bore first.
The FNAR is a different rifle, not just another “me too” copy of another military rifle design. It has a unique and reliable gas piston system, is relatively light weight for a rifle of this type and caliber, and I think that the FNAR would prove to be very useful to our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, in situations where more power is needed than the 5.56mm can provide, but where a rifle that is more portable than the big Barrett .50 caliber (http://www.gunblast.com/JW_Big50.htm) can be used effectively.
For the rest of us, the FNAR is an excellent choice of a semi-auto rifle can reach out and touch a target at long range, with full 7.62 NATO power, and hit those targets with precision. The FNAR is also easy on the shoulder. Even after long sessions on the bench, there was no fatigue. The gas system and stock design very effectively attenuate the recoil of the 7.62 NATO cartridge. The stock is highly adjustable to fit most shooters properly, and the rifle is very easy to shoot well. The FNAR is light enough to serve double duty as a hunting rifle, and is more accurate than most bolt-actions on the market. It balances well, carries well, and shoots well. It is an excellent choice for a main battle rifle to protect the homestead (http://www.gunblast.com/Homeland_Security.htm), or as a rifle for gathering meat for the freezer. As I type this, our new President-elect has promised to ban the manufacture and sale of such rifles, so there is no better time to buy one than right now.


I looked at one in Missouri today, got to feel it out. I thought they wanted too much. Came home and found one on gunbroker for $275 less.

http://pics.gunbroker.com/GB/126779000/126779748/pix607021015.jpg

Now that I've finally found my .308, optics and ammunition is all I'll be looking at. Haven't told the wife yet. Not sure if I will.

Vegas
04-10-2009, 09:13 PM
Last one or latest one?

ryr8828
04-10-2009, 09:16 PM
Last one or latest one?

Last one for a while.

Vegas
04-10-2009, 09:17 PM
Last one for a while.

I've said that before only to find a great deal that I couldn't refuse.

ryr8828
04-11-2009, 09:10 AM
Now it's the waiting game, I've received no contact from the seller even though I emailed them last night. I'd think that they would be anxious to get their money.

domenick2x
04-11-2009, 09:19 AM
FNH-USA continues to introduce interesting and useful fighting weapons. Even while supplying our military with a lot of the arms used to fight terrorism on two different fronts, FNH still has the time and manufacturing capacity to supply the rest of us with new firearm designs. The FNAR shown here has been with me for a couple of weeks now, and has proven to be one hundred percent reliable, and extremely accurate for a fighting rifle.

Out of curiousity, who are you fighting?

ryr8828
04-11-2009, 09:58 AM
Out of curiousity, who are you fighting?I'm not fighting anyone or thing at the present time except some people's ignorance about firearms.

If a rifle or handgun is suitable for military or law enforcement use that just makes it that much more dependable for my use. I was looking for a long range and extremely accurate .308 and this rifle fits the bill. FNH makes very good firearms. If I could have found an FN .45 at the time I bought my Springfield XD .45, I would have bought one of those.

My hobby isn't any different than someone who likes to fix up cars or collect expensive stamps, it's just seems that my hobby seems to scare some people, including the liberals in government.

domenick2x
04-11-2009, 10:12 AM
I'm not fighting anyone or thing at the present time except some people's ignorance about firearms.

If a rifle or handgun is suitable for military or law enforcement use that just makes it that much more dependable for my use. I was looking for a long range and extremely accurate .308 and this rifle fits the bill. FNH makes very good firearms. If I could have found an FN .45 at the time I bought my Springfield XD .45, I would have bought one of those.

My hobby isn't any different than someone who likes to fix up cars or collect expensive stamps, it's just seems that my hobby seems to scare some people, including the liberals in government.
Seems a little over the top to me, but have fun.

My brother has a similar interest, but he's exclusively into hunting weaponry.

ryr8828
04-11-2009, 10:24 AM
Seems a little over the top to me, but have fun.

My brother has a similar interest, but he's exclusively into hunting weaponry.

I can kill an elk with my rifle as easily or more so than with one which has a wood stock and doesn't scare people.

domenick2x
04-11-2009, 11:12 AM
I can kill an elk with my rifle as easily or more so than with one which has a wood stock and doesn't scare people.
Wood stock, smaller clip, lack of a pistol grip... and it is no longer a 'fighting weapon'?

One wonders why you prefer one over the other. Lower maintenance costs with the synthetic stock? Or is just because

As I type this, our new President-elect has promised to ban the manufacture and sale of such rifles, so there is no better time to buy one than right now.

ryr8828
04-11-2009, 11:15 AM
Because I can.

domenick2x
04-11-2009, 11:24 AM
Because I can.
Good enough.

Personally, though I don't currently own a gun, I prefer the look and feel of a good walnut stock.

To each his own, I guess. Just be sure to get it registered, if that's the law in your state.

Jesse Helms' Ghost
04-12-2009, 01:29 AM
Not that you really want to, but ya'll might wanna watch tomorrow's episode of 60 Minutes. They're doing a story on the fact that gun sales are up.

They're teasing the story with, "You'll be surprised to find out why."

ryr8828
04-12-2009, 08:05 AM
Good enough.

Personally, though I don't currently own a gun, I prefer the look and feel of a good walnut stock.

To each his own, I guess. Just be sure to get it registered, if that's the law in your state.

Did you forget that I live in Obamastan (Illinois)?

I have to fill out a 2 page form, pay the guy $25 for giving me the form since the rifle is coming from out of state (PA), show my foid card which cost me $10, certify that I am not the least bit insane, do 25 one arm pushups, then pledge allegiance to Obama and Mayor Daley before I can take delivery of the rifle.

This rifle would not be allowed for sale in Chicago legally to the best of my knowledge. If I lived in Chicago and wanted this rifle I would have to go down to the projects and get one off of a homeboy for cash or possibly a good supply of crack cocaine (which would present a problem since I have no idea where to buy crack cocaine).

Roy Munson
04-13-2009, 08:44 PM
My hobby isn't any different than someone who likes to fix up cars or collect expensive stamps, it's just seems that my hobby seems to scare some people, including the liberals in government.

people who fix up old cars are either killed by a jack failing or by the lack of airbags

people who collect expensive stamps could die if they're allergic to the glue, though I doubt they'd lick a rare stamp unless they're stupid.

Guns fire projectiles for the sole purpose of killing something. How is that anywhere close to the previous two.

People will have whatever hobbies they want, but I don't understand the need to rationalize it beyond what it is.

oh, I forgot the possible paper cut of death from stamps.

ryr8828
04-13-2009, 08:47 PM
people who fix up old cars are either killed by a jack failing or by the lack of airbags

people who collect expensive stamps could die if they're allergic to the glue, though I doubt they'd lick a rare stamp unless they're stupid.

Guns fire projectiles for the sole purpose of killing something. How is that anywhere close to the previous two.

People will have whatever hobbies they want, but I don't understand the need to rationalize it beyond what it is.

oh, I forgot the possible paper cut of death from stamps.

I don't shoot at anything but paper anymore.

That still doesn't change the meaning of the 2nd Amendment.

ryr8828
04-15-2009, 01:52 PM
Gun shop called, I'm going to go pick it up shortly. Then I have to stop and buy a scope and rings, the ffl I used doesn't have anything good in stock. And buy some .308 cartridges.

It's like Christmas in April.

Vegas
04-15-2009, 01:53 PM
Gun shop called, I'm going to go pick it up shortly. Then I have to stop and buy a scope and rings, the ffl I used doesn't have anything good in stock. And buy some .308 cartridges.

It's like Christmas in April.

What's your favorite brand of scope?

ryr8828
04-15-2009, 01:56 PM
http://www.fnhusa.com/support/images/dynamic/m/FNM0136mb.png

http://www.fnhusa.com/le/downloads/wallpaper/2008/200905800.jpg

ryr8828
04-15-2009, 01:59 PM
What's your favorite brand of scope?

I haven't bought a scope in years and after laying out $1300 for this rifle I'm going cheap for now. I'm buying a nikon 3-9x 40 that a local gun shop has "on sale" for $150. I'll use it while I do some more research, then move it to my ar or ak when I buy a good scope for this rifle later.

From my research so far it seems that some people buy scopes for this rifle that actually cost more than the rifle itself, I'm not that serious about it but I would like to be able to zero something at 800 yards.

Vegas
04-15-2009, 02:01 PM
I haven't bought a scope in years and after laying out $1300 for this rifle I'm going cheap for now. I'm buying a nikon 3-9x 40 that a local gun shop has "on sale" for $150. I'll use it while I do some more research, then move it to my ar or ak when I buy a good scope for this rifle later.

From my research so far it seems that some people buy scopes for this rifle that actually cost more than the rifle itself, I'm not that serious about it but I would like to be able to zero something at 800 yards.

I've never used a Nikon scope but have heard good things about them. I have a couple of Leupold scopes, a Shepherd, and a Weatherby. Weatherby no longer makes scopes.

ryr8828
04-15-2009, 08:53 PM
I ended up with a Burris Fullfield II. Guaranteed for life and has bdc marks on the recticle.
Came with a gps which I may never use.

Roy Munson
04-16-2009, 07:42 PM
I don't shoot at anything but paper anymore.

That still doesn't change the meaning of the 2nd Amendment.
The 2nd ammendment is pretty vague.

and if I must say so... vastly outdated.

ryr8828
04-16-2009, 08:37 PM
The 2nd ammendment is pretty vague.

and if I must say so... vastly outdated.

The concept of government tyranny is never out dated.